Thursday, May 25, 2006
While the World Is Still Sleeping...
This is a Quinn and Rose thing from this a.m. (104.7 here, XM165 by satellite) ...We'll be bidding America goodbye. Or saying hello to the New America Order. Jerome R. Corsi writes at Human Events, quoting Miguel Pickard on the NAFTA Plus regulations proposal:
Contrary to NAFTA, whose tenets were laid out in a single negotiated treaty subjected to at least cursory review by the legislatures of the participating countries, NAFTA Plus is more the elites’ shared vision of what a merged future will look like. Their ideas are being implemented through the signing of "regulations," not subject to citizens' review. The vision may initially have been labeled NAFTA Plus, but the name gives a mistaken impression of what is at hand, since there will be no single treaty text, no unique label to facilitate keeping tabs. Perhaps for this reason, some civil society groups are calling the phenomenon by another name, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPPNA), an official sobriquet for the summits held by the three chief executives to agree on the future of "North America."
The reason for alarm is the related article in the Detroit News from Judge Michael Warren about Keeping America in Public Schools. Michigan Department of Education has denied this scandalous, treasonous? mishandling of our children's education and time will tell, I hope. Ask Karen Todorov:
No to America: What a state social studies consultant is telling educators in e-mails about using "America" and "Americans" in tests and courses:
"I have promised teachers that we would delete the use of American [when we are really ONLY referring to the United States] from the GLCEs (grade level content expectations) so that everything is consistent and correct as soon as it was feasible."
"It is ethnocentric for the United States to claim the entire hemisphere." -- Karen Todorov, Michigan Department of Education
Quinn hopes to contact Judge Warren. My heartfelt concern compares to Quinn's closing words today: "Somebody help me!" If there is no direct connection to "NAFTA Plus", well...Satan is good at what he does. Conspiracy or no, it gives me the creeps.
Contrary to NAFTA, whose tenets were laid out in a single negotiated treaty subjected to at least cursory review by the legislatures of the participating countries, NAFTA Plus is more the elites’ shared vision of what a merged future will look like. Their ideas are being implemented through the signing of "regulations," not subject to citizens' review. The vision may initially have been labeled NAFTA Plus, but the name gives a mistaken impression of what is at hand, since there will be no single treaty text, no unique label to facilitate keeping tabs. Perhaps for this reason, some civil society groups are calling the phenomenon by another name, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America (SPPNA), an official sobriquet for the summits held by the three chief executives to agree on the future of "North America."
The reason for alarm is the related article in the Detroit News from Judge Michael Warren about Keeping America in Public Schools. Michigan Department of Education has denied this scandalous, treasonous? mishandling of our children's education and time will tell, I hope. Ask Karen Todorov:
No to America: What a state social studies consultant is telling educators in e-mails about using "America" and "Americans" in tests and courses:
"I have promised teachers that we would delete the use of American [when we are really ONLY referring to the United States] from the GLCEs (grade level content expectations) so that everything is consistent and correct as soon as it was feasible."
"It is ethnocentric for the United States to claim the entire hemisphere." -- Karen Todorov, Michigan Department of Education
Quinn hopes to contact Judge Warren. My heartfelt concern compares to Quinn's closing words today: "Somebody help me!" If there is no direct connection to "NAFTA Plus", well...Satan is good at what he does. Conspiracy or no, it gives me the creeps.
Comments:
<< Home
So, you don't like accuracy? Or you don't like sharing the continent?
I'm proud to be a citizen of the United States. Why would anyone criticize a book and test author for making "citizen of the U.S." distinct from "citizen of North America?" What are you embarrassed about?
Post a Comment
I'm proud to be a citizen of the United States. Why would anyone criticize a book and test author for making "citizen of the U.S." distinct from "citizen of North America?" What are you embarrassed about?
<< Home
